<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 401 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210218</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the appellant company&#039;s principal business was granting loans and advances, including bill rediscounting, not trading in shares. As a result, the provisions of Explanation to Section 73 were deemed inapplicable. The Tribunal overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, removing the speculation loss addition and ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 401 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210218</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the appellant company&#039;s principal business was granting loans and advances, including bill rediscounting, not trading in shares. As a result, the provisions of Explanation to Section 73 were deemed inapplicable. The Tribunal overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, removing the speculation loss addition and ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>