<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 623 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210210</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the order of confiscation and imposed a reduced redemption fine and penalty on the appellants due to the unexplained excess of excisable goods found at the factory premises. The decision highlighted the necessity of maintaining accurate records and verifying duty payments to prevent penalties and confiscation under Rule 25 and Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 18:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 623 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210210</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the order of confiscation and imposed a reduced redemption fine and penalty on the appellants due to the unexplained excess of excisable goods found at the factory premises. The decision highlighted the necessity of maintaining accurate records and verifying duty payments to prevent penalties and confiscation under Rule 25 and Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210210</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>