<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 926 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210207</link>
    <description>Interest on differential amounts recovered through supplementary invoices was held payable, the liability being treated as settled against the assessee by the Supreme Court authority relied on. The demand of interest was therefore upheld. Penalty was not warranted on the facts, and the original authority&#039;s view sustaining penalty was found unsustainable, so the penalty was set aside. The appellate order was accordingly set aside and the original authority&#039;s order was restored only to the extent of interest, while the relief from penalty was maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 18:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 926 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210207</link>
      <description>Interest on differential amounts recovered through supplementary invoices was held payable, the liability being treated as settled against the assessee by the Supreme Court authority relied on. The demand of interest was therefore upheld. Penalty was not warranted on the facts, and the original authority&#039;s view sustaining penalty was found unsustainable, so the penalty was set aside. The appellate order was accordingly set aside and the original authority&#039;s order was restored only to the extent of interest, while the relief from penalty was maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>