<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 924 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210205</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Delhi, set aside the impugned order due to the denial of a fair opportunity to be heard to the appellants, particularly the main appellant, M/s Hindustan Mint and Agro Products Pvt. Limited. The Tribunal emphasized that the short notice for the hearing, received just a day before the scheduled date, and the restrictions imposed on the appellants&#039; representative rendered their absence justifiable. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner for a new hearing, ensuring all appellants are given a fair chance to present their case without expressing any opinion on the case&#039;s merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 18:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 924 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210205</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Delhi, set aside the impugned order due to the denial of a fair opportunity to be heard to the appellants, particularly the main appellant, M/s Hindustan Mint and Agro Products Pvt. Limited. The Tribunal emphasized that the short notice for the hearing, received just a day before the scheduled date, and the restrictions imposed on the appellants&#039; representative rendered their absence justifiable. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner for a new hearing, ensuring all appellants are given a fair chance to present their case without expressing any opinion on the case&#039;s merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>