<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 396 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210203</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the interest liability on delayed payment of duty, dismissing the appeal. It found no violation of natural justice principles in finalizing the assessment and held that the SKF India Ltd. ruling applies. The Tribunal clarified that interest is chargeable from the date the duty was initially due, emphasizing the due date for payment of duty as the date of goods removal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 396 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210203</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the interest liability on delayed payment of duty, dismissing the appeal. It found no violation of natural justice principles in finalizing the assessment and held that the SKF India Ltd. ruling applies. The Tribunal clarified that interest is chargeable from the date the duty was initially due, emphasizing the due date for payment of duty as the date of goods removal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210203</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>