<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 394 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210195</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellant, Sobha Developers Ltd., and granted consequential relief. The services provided to SEZ units were held to be exempted services under Notification No. 4/2004-ST, and the restrictions under rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules were not applicable due to the conditional nature of the exemption notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 394 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210195</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellant, Sobha Developers Ltd., and granted consequential relief. The services provided to SEZ units were held to be exempted services under Notification No. 4/2004-ST, and the restrictions under rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules were not applicable due to the conditional nature of the exemption notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210195</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>