<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 620 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210194</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition challenging the validity of the search and seizure operation under the Income-tax Act. It held that the seizure was invalid as the Income-tax Department lacked valid reasons to believe the money in the current account was undisclosed income. The court quashed the warrant of authorization and directed the Department to return Rs. 12.39 crores with interest to the petitioner&#039;s account. Additionally, it recommended an inquiry into the alleged improper actions of the tax officials.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 620 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210194</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition challenging the validity of the search and seizure operation under the Income-tax Act. It held that the seizure was invalid as the Income-tax Department lacked valid reasons to believe the money in the current account was undisclosed income. The court quashed the warrant of authorization and directed the Department to return Rs. 12.39 crores with interest to the petitioner&#039;s account. Additionally, it recommended an inquiry into the alleged improper actions of the tax officials.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>