<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 918 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210183</link>
    <description>The Tribunal addressed the waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in service tax and penalty under &#039;Manpower Supply&#039; service. Analyzing the agreement between the appellant trust and the sugar factory, the Tribunal considered responsibilities, control over laborers, and consideration for services. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument and previous orders, the Tribunal sided with the Revenue&#039;s view that the trust provided manpower to the factory. Emphasizing the lack of evidence for the pre-agreement period and the appellant&#039;s financial status, the Tribunal required a higher pre-deposit of Rs.15,00,000 within a specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2012 12:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 918 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210183</link>
      <description>The Tribunal addressed the waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in service tax and penalty under &#039;Manpower Supply&#039; service. Analyzing the agreement between the appellant trust and the sugar factory, the Tribunal considered responsibilities, control over laborers, and consideration for services. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument and previous orders, the Tribunal sided with the Revenue&#039;s view that the trust provided manpower to the factory. Emphasizing the lack of evidence for the pre-agreement period and the appellant&#039;s financial status, the Tribunal required a higher pre-deposit of Rs.15,00,000 within a specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>