<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 612 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210171</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, a proprietorship concern providing loading services, in a case concerning service tax liability for cargo handling services. The Tribunal set aside the penalties imposed under various sections of the Finance Act, considering the appellant&#039;s reliance on Circular No. 11/1/2002-TRU and previous judgments where penalties on individuals providing similar services were waived. The Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s confusion regarding their tax liability was justified, leading to the conclusion that the penalties imposed were not justified, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 612 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210171</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, a proprietorship concern providing loading services, in a case concerning service tax liability for cargo handling services. The Tribunal set aside the penalties imposed under various sections of the Finance Act, considering the appellant&#039;s reliance on Circular No. 11/1/2002-TRU and previous judgments where penalties on individuals providing similar services were waived. The Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s confusion regarding their tax liability was justified, leading to the conclusion that the penalties imposed were not justified, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>