<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 611 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210170</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order, ruling that the services provided did not qualify as &#039;Management Consultancy Service&#039; and the appellant was entitled to an exemption under Notification No.6/99-ST. The appeal was allowed with possible relief. Other arguments were not addressed as the case was decided on primary issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 611 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210170</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order, ruling that the services provided did not qualify as &#039;Management Consultancy Service&#039; and the appellant was entitled to an exemption under Notification No.6/99-ST. The appeal was allowed with possible relief. Other arguments were not addressed as the case was decided on primary issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210170</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>