<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 580 - ITAT, VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210165</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming that the donations were corpus donations exempt under section 11(1)(d) of the Income-tax Act. It held that the donations were voluntary contributions intended for the corpus fund, not capitation fees. The tribunal emphasized the significance of the donor&#039;s specific direction in classifying donations and upheld the exemptions granted to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 580 - ITAT, VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210165</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming that the donations were corpus donations exempt under section 11(1)(d) of the Income-tax Act. It held that the donations were voluntary contributions intended for the corpus fund, not capitation fees. The tribunal emphasized the significance of the donor&#039;s specific direction in classifying donations and upheld the exemptions granted to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>