<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 601 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210149</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision in a case involving a dispute over the confirmation of Cenvat Credit demand without specific mention in the show cause notice. The Tribunal agreed that since the Cenvat Credit had already been reversed and not proposed for recovery in the notice, confirming the demand was unnecessary. The Tribunal also upheld the decision to set aside interest and penalty, except for the interest portion, which was restored based on the original adjudicating authority&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 601 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210149</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision in a case involving a dispute over the confirmation of Cenvat Credit demand without specific mention in the show cause notice. The Tribunal agreed that since the Cenvat Credit had already been reversed and not proposed for recovery in the notice, confirming the demand was unnecessary. The Tribunal also upheld the decision to set aside interest and penalty, except for the interest portion, which was restored based on the original adjudicating authority&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210149</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>