<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 600 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210148</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and the jurisdictional Deputy Commissioner. The Tribunal held that reversal of Cenvat Credit on the sale of used capital goods is not necessary, based on the precedent set by previous judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 600 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210148</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and the jurisdictional Deputy Commissioner. The Tribunal held that reversal of Cenvat Credit on the sale of used capital goods is not necessary, based on the precedent set by previous judgments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>