<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 905 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210141</link>
    <description>Material evidence central to the valuation dispute, including price declaration, marketing pattern declaration, invoices and the Chartered Accountant&#039;s statement on pass-on of trade discount, was not examined in depth. The finding that no discount had been passed on was based on selected invoices alone, without discussion of the legal position on deduction of discount where it was not separately reflected in the price declaration. As the controversy turned on evidence going to the root of valuation, the impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after considering all relevant materials and contentions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 13:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 905 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210141</link>
      <description>Material evidence central to the valuation dispute, including price declaration, marketing pattern declaration, invoices and the Chartered Accountant&#039;s statement on pass-on of trade discount, was not examined in depth. The finding that no discount had been passed on was based on selected invoices alone, without discussion of the legal position on deduction of discount where it was not separately reflected in the price declaration. As the controversy turned on evidence going to the root of valuation, the impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after considering all relevant materials and contentions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>