https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210136 The Tribunal held that the respondent had the right to realize duty from buyers on non-manufactured and non-dutiable goods, was not obligated to deposit additional amounts into the treasury, and was entitled to adjust duty payable on intermediate goods against duty paid on non-dutiable goods. The Tribunal found that the respondent's actions did not amount to unjust enrichment as the duty collected was paid to the Government. Consequently, the reference was disposed of in favor of the respondent. en-us Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210136 The Tribunal held that the respondent had the right to realize duty from buyers on non-manufactured and non-dutiable goods, was not obligated to deposit additional amounts into the treasury, and was entitled to adjust duty payable on intermediate goods against duty paid on non-dutiable goods. The Tribunal found that the respondent's actions did not amount to unjust enrichment as the duty collected was paid to the Government. Consequently, the reference was disposed of in favor of the respondent. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210136