<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 898 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210134</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the case to the adjudicating authority to verify compliance with Cenvat Credit Rules and relevant notifications. The authority was instructed to consider specific periods for the refund claim amounts. The Tribunal highlighted the objective of preventing export of Indian taxes through the indirect taxation system.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 898 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210134</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the case to the adjudicating authority to verify compliance with Cenvat Credit Rules and relevant notifications. The authority was instructed to consider specific periods for the refund claim amounts. The Tribunal highlighted the objective of preventing export of Indian taxes through the indirect taxation system.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>