<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 897 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210133</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the department&#039;s appeal, dismissed the cross objection by the respondent firm, and rejected the appeal challenging the penalty imposition. The decision emphasized compliance with excise rules and upheld penalties for violations, maintaining the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s reduced penalties as reasonable in the circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 897 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210133</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the department&#039;s appeal, dismissed the cross objection by the respondent firm, and rejected the appeal challenging the penalty imposition. The decision emphasized compliance with excise rules and upheld penalties for violations, maintaining the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s reduced penalties as reasonable in the circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>