<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 890 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210124</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeal)&#039;s decision in a case concerning the availability of deemed modvat credit for grey fabrics held by the respondent. The Tribunal found that the grey fabrics were sent to job workers for processing, with duty paid by the job workers on behalf of the respondent, in compliance with relevant rules. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the importance of proper documentation and duty payment in determining the validity of modvat credit claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 19:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 890 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210124</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeal)&#039;s decision in a case concerning the availability of deemed modvat credit for grey fabrics held by the respondent. The Tribunal found that the grey fabrics were sent to job workers for processing, with duty paid by the job workers on behalf of the respondent, in compliance with relevant rules. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the importance of proper documentation and duty payment in determining the validity of modvat credit claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>