<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 890 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210124</link>
    <description>Deemed MODVAT credit on grey fabrics lying in stock on 01.04.2004 was upheld because the fabrics were sent to job workers under the assessee&#039;s invoices for processing under the prescribed procedure, and duty was paid when the processed goods were cleared. In that revenue-neutral situation, denial of transitional credit was not justified. The objection based on an alert circular and alleged non-existence of the unit could not prevail, as those points were not part of the show-cause notice or the orders below and did not displace the factual findings on remand. The demand with interest was therefore not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 19:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 890 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210124</link>
      <description>Deemed MODVAT credit on grey fabrics lying in stock on 01.04.2004 was upheld because the fabrics were sent to job workers under the assessee&#039;s invoices for processing under the prescribed procedure, and duty was paid when the processed goods were cleared. In that revenue-neutral situation, denial of transitional credit was not justified. The objection based on an alert circular and alleged non-existence of the unit could not prevail, as those points were not part of the show-cause notice or the orders below and did not displace the factual findings on remand. The demand with interest was therefore not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>