<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 387 - ITAT, AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210122</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for the assessment years 2003-04, 2004-05, and 2006-07, holding that Section 2(22)(e) regarding deemed dividends was not applicable as the assessee company was not a registered shareholder of M/s. MPPL. Additionally, the Tribunal deleted the Section 68 addition for the assessment year 2006-07 based on the rule of consistency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 387 - ITAT, AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210122</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for the assessment years 2003-04, 2004-05, and 2006-07, holding that Section 2(22)(e) regarding deemed dividends was not applicable as the assessee company was not a registered shareholder of M/s. MPPL. Additionally, the Tribunal deleted the Section 68 addition for the assessment year 2006-07 based on the rule of consistency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>