<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 588 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210107</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the deletion of notional interest on a deposit with a company was upheld, with the ITAT dismissing the ground. However, regarding the tax treatment of amounts deducted by a foreign company, the ITAT partially allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to give the assessee the benefit of tax credit paid by the foreign company. The judgment provided detailed analysis and legal interpretations, resulting in a partial allowance of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 17:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 588 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210107</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the deletion of notional interest on a deposit with a company was upheld, with the ITAT dismissing the ground. However, regarding the tax treatment of amounts deducted by a foreign company, the ITAT partially allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to give the assessee the benefit of tax credit paid by the foreign company. The judgment provided detailed analysis and legal interpretations, resulting in a partial allowance of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>