<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 884 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210104</link>
    <description>The ITAT remitted the appeals back to the Assessing Officer based on a previous decision, emphasizing the need for a fair hearing and consistent application of tax laws. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed for statistical purposes, while the appeal of the revenue was treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 884 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210104</link>
      <description>The ITAT remitted the appeals back to the Assessing Officer based on a previous decision, emphasizing the need for a fair hearing and consistent application of tax laws. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed for statistical purposes, while the appeal of the revenue was treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>