<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 877 - ITAT, New Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210095</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for both assessment years, remanding the primary issue of mark-up addition back to the AO for fresh examination. The Tribunal allowed the claims for entertainment, staff function, and business development expenses while upholding the disallowance of cell phone expenses for directors&#039; spouses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 877 - ITAT, New Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210095</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for both assessment years, remanding the primary issue of mark-up addition back to the AO for fresh examination. The Tribunal allowed the claims for entertainment, staff function, and business development expenses while upholding the disallowance of cell phone expenses for directors&#039; spouses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>