<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 576 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210079</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to recompute the capital gain by considering the full value of consideration as Rs. 2.50 crores and determining the cost of acquisition based on the market value of the lease rights as on 16-08-2004. The tribunal also clarified that the plot did not retain the character of agricultural land and Section 50C was not applicable to lease rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183515" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 576 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210079</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to recompute the capital gain by considering the full value of consideration as Rs. 2.50 crores and determining the cost of acquisition based on the market value of the lease rights as on 16-08-2004. The tribunal also clarified that the plot did not retain the character of agricultural land and Section 50C was not applicable to lease rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>