<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 571 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210070</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the amount paid by the assessee to its sister concern was not for business purposes and therefore, the deduction under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act was not allowed. The Tribunal&#039;s decision disallowing the claimed trading loss was upheld, ruling against the assessee. The reference was disposed of with costs in favor of the revenue authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 17:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 571 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210070</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the amount paid by the assessee to its sister concern was not for business purposes and therefore, the deduction under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act was not allowed. The Tribunal&#039;s decision disallowing the claimed trading loss was upheld, ruling against the assessee. The reference was disposed of with costs in favor of the revenue authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>