<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 568 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210065</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision treating the appellant as an agent of non-residents under section 163 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, due to a business connection. It also confirmed the taxability of income received by non-residents from the appellant in India, as there was no treaty between India and Hong Kong. The Tribunal dismissed all appeals, emphasizing the business connection and absence of a treaty, leading to the tax liability in India for the non-residents&#039; income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 11:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 568 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210065</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision treating the appellant as an agent of non-residents under section 163 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, due to a business connection. It also confirmed the taxability of income received by non-residents from the appellant in India, as there was no treaty between India and Hong Kong. The Tribunal dismissed all appeals, emphasizing the business connection and absence of a treaty, leading to the tax liability in India for the non-residents&#039; income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>