<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 564 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210060</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s invocation of Section 263, finding that the Assessing Officer had not adequately examined the issue of the surrendered cash. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was set aside, restoring the Commissioner&#039;s order for re-examination. The case was disposed of with directions for the Commissioner (Appeals) to decide on the appeals against the fresh assessment order on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 18:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 564 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210060</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s invocation of Section 263, finding that the Assessing Officer had not adequately examined the issue of the surrendered cash. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was set aside, restoring the Commissioner&#039;s order for re-examination. The case was disposed of with directions for the Commissioner (Appeals) to decide on the appeals against the fresh assessment order on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>