<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 859 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210055</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals filed by the appellant, upholding the decisions made by the lower authorities and the Tribunal regarding the issues of valuation of closing stock, cash credit, excess loss claimed in the Bardana account, and the validity of orders based on presumption. The Court found no grounds to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s findings, emphasizing the importance of providing adequate evidence to support claims in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 18:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 859 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210055</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals filed by the appellant, upholding the decisions made by the lower authorities and the Tribunal regarding the issues of valuation of closing stock, cash credit, excess loss claimed in the Bardana account, and the validity of orders based on presumption. The Court found no grounds to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s findings, emphasizing the importance of providing adequate evidence to support claims in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>