<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 562 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210052</link>
    <description>The Special Bench concluded that the interest on income-tax refund is not effectively connected with the Permanent Establishment (PE) and is taxable under paragraph no. 2 of Article XI at 15% on a gross basis. However, the interest from the bank on fixed deposits, being effectively connected with the PE, is taxable under Article VII. The order was pronounced on 6th May, 2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 12:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 562 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210052</link>
      <description>The Special Bench concluded that the interest on income-tax refund is not effectively connected with the Permanent Establishment (PE) and is taxable under paragraph no. 2 of Article XI at 15% on a gross basis. However, the interest from the bank on fixed deposits, being effectively connected with the PE, is taxable under Article VII. The order was pronounced on 6th May, 2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>