<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 376 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210026</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the suspension of the CHA license under Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004, for involvement in smuggling activities. It found the timing of the suspension order to be compliant with Regulation 20 (2) and emphasized the importance of providing a post-decisional hearing despite the expiration of the prescribed period. The Tribunal directed the CHA to attend a post-decisional hearing for procedural fairness, following legal precedents and regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2014 14:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 376 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210026</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the suspension of the CHA license under Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004, for involvement in smuggling activities. It found the timing of the suspension order to be compliant with Regulation 20 (2) and emphasized the importance of providing a post-decisional hearing despite the expiration of the prescribed period. The Tribunal directed the CHA to attend a post-decisional hearing for procedural fairness, following legal precedents and regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>