<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 371 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210021</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI partially allowed the appeal, upholding the classification of &quot;Helmisol&quot; under Tariff Heading 30.03 as medicaments. The penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was reduced to Rs.6,500, and the penalty under Rule 13 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 was upheld at Rs.5,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 09:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183459" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 371 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210021</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI partially allowed the appeal, upholding the classification of &quot;Helmisol&quot; under Tariff Heading 30.03 as medicaments. The penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was reduced to Rs.6,500, and the penalty under Rule 13 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 was upheld at Rs.5,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210021</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>