<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 370 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210020</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by way of remand, with the decision being dictated and pronounced in open court. The judgment emphasized the importance of producing necessary documentation to support claims for availing credit and the need for a fair opportunity for the assessees to present their case before the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 20:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183458" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 370 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210020</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by way of remand, with the decision being dictated and pronounced in open court. The judgment emphasized the importance of producing necessary documentation to support claims for availing credit and the need for a fair opportunity for the assessees to present their case before the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>