https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210011 The interim dispute concerned waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in a service tax matter. The appellant argued that part of the demand for the period before 10.09.2004 was covered by an existing Tribunal ruling, that it acted only as a booking agent for outstation travel agents, and that some amounts were mere reimbursements. The Tribunal noted that the appellant had already deposited Rs. 9,29,565 during investigation and treated that payment as sufficient for hearing the appeal. On that basis, the balance pre-deposit was waived and recovery of the remaining demand was stayed until disposal of the appeal. en-us Mon, 23 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Jul 2013 11:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210011 The interim dispute concerned waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in a service tax matter. The appellant argued that part of the demand for the period before 10.09.2004 was covered by an existing Tribunal ruling, that it acted only as a booking agent for outstation travel agents, and that some amounts were mere reimbursements. The Tribunal noted that the appellant had already deposited Rs. 9,29,565 during investigation and treated that payment as sufficient for hearing the appeal. On that basis, the balance pre-deposit was waived and recovery of the remaining demand was stayed until disposal of the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 23 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210011