<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 559 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209984</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by M/s. Parshwanath World Vision against the Order-in-Appeal confirming a demand of Rs.5,503 based on service tax was allowed. The appellant&#039;s argument that they were not aware of the service tax incidence and reliance on a specific C.B.E.&amp;amp;C. letter was considered. The Revenue&#039;s contention regarding suppression of facts and delay in compliance was dismissed, emphasizing the need for deliberate non-disclosure to evade duty payment. The C.B.E.&amp;amp;C. letter was deemed relevant, leading to a favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 18:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 559 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209984</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by M/s. Parshwanath World Vision against the Order-in-Appeal confirming a demand of Rs.5,503 based on service tax was allowed. The appellant&#039;s argument that they were not aware of the service tax incidence and reliance on a specific C.B.E.&amp;amp;C. letter was considered. The Revenue&#039;s contention regarding suppression of facts and delay in compliance was dismissed, emphasizing the need for deliberate non-disclosure to evade duty payment. The C.B.E.&amp;amp;C. letter was deemed relevant, leading to a favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>