<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 558 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209982</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by the High Court, setting aside the impugned order due to lack of contest on limitation regarding CENVAT Credit for certain items considered as capital goods. The case was remanded for further consideration based on the argument that the items could be eligible if used for machinery parts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 18:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183421" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 558 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209982</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by the High Court, setting aside the impugned order due to lack of contest on limitation regarding CENVAT Credit for certain items considered as capital goods. The case was remanded for further consideration based on the argument that the items could be eligible if used for machinery parts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>