<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 352 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209978</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Original that directed the ceramic tile manufacturer to discharge Service Tax liability on technical assistance received from machinery manufacturers. Relying on legal precedents, including the Indian National Shipowners Association case, the Tribunal held that the recipient of services could only be taxed from a specific date, rendering the impugned order unsustainable. The appellant&#039;s arguments were supported by legal authorities, resulting in the Tribunal providing consequential relief by deeming the impugned order unsustainable and setting it aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 18:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 352 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209978</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Original that directed the ceramic tile manufacturer to discharge Service Tax liability on technical assistance received from machinery manufacturers. Relying on legal precedents, including the Indian National Shipowners Association case, the Tribunal held that the recipient of services could only be taxed from a specific date, rendering the impugned order unsustainable. The appellant&#039;s arguments were supported by legal authorities, resulting in the Tribunal providing consequential relief by deeming the impugned order unsustainable and setting it aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>