<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 552 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209973</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, remanded a case involving a failure to obtain registration for a unit leading to non-payment of service tax. The appellant sought a remand to provide a reconciliation statement to prove tax payment, framing the issue as a procedural error. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for the appellant to produce relevant documents, including a reconciliation statement. The original adjudicating authority was directed to reconsider the issue, with the appellant agreeing not to file a refund claim until a decision was made. The stay petition and appeal were resolved based on the terms outlined in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 552 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209973</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, remanded a case involving a failure to obtain registration for a unit leading to non-payment of service tax. The appellant sought a remand to provide a reconciliation statement to prove tax payment, framing the issue as a procedural error. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for the appellant to produce relevant documents, including a reconciliation statement. The original adjudicating authority was directed to reconsider the issue, with the appellant agreeing not to file a refund claim until a decision was made. The stay petition and appeal were resolved based on the terms outlined in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>