https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209969 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, granting a waiver of the pre-deposit requirement and remanding the matter for a decision on merits without insisting on any pre-deposit. This decision was based on the illogical requirement imposed by the Commissioner and the admissibility of the service tax credit for courier and CHA services. The impugned order was set aside, allowing the appeal to proceed for a decision on its merits without the need for any pre-deposit. en-us Mon, 25 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Jul 2013 12:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209969 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, granting a waiver of the pre-deposit requirement and remanding the matter for a decision on merits without insisting on any pre-deposit. This decision was based on the illogical requirement imposed by the Commissioner and the admissibility of the service tax credit for courier and CHA services. The impugned order was set aside, allowing the appeal to proceed for a decision on its merits without the need for any pre-deposit. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 25 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209969