<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 548 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209968</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need for the appellant to provide adequate evidence regarding the inclusion of outdoor catering costs in production expenses. The decision highlighted the significance of clear documentation and proper verification in determining eligibility for service tax credit on outdoor catering services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 548 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209968</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need for the appellant to provide adequate evidence regarding the inclusion of outdoor catering costs in production expenses. The decision highlighted the significance of clear documentation and proper verification in determining eligibility for service tax credit on outdoor catering services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>