<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 336 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209940</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, in a case concerning the valuation of physician samples for PMP medicines, upheld previous decisions against the appellants. Despite citing confusion and earlier favorable decisions, the appellants contested the demand on limitation grounds. The Tribunal remanded the matter to the Commissioner for a decision on the limitation issue, emphasizing the need to consider established legal principles. The impugned order was set aside, and the case was referred back for further proceedings. (Case decided on 22.06.2011 by Mrs. Archana Wadhwa and Mr. B.S.V. Murthy, JJ.)</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 15:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 336 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209940</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, in a case concerning the valuation of physician samples for PMP medicines, upheld previous decisions against the appellants. Despite citing confusion and earlier favorable decisions, the appellants contested the demand on limitation grounds. The Tribunal remanded the matter to the Commissioner for a decision on the limitation issue, emphasizing the need to consider established legal principles. The impugned order was set aside, and the case was referred back for further proceedings. (Case decided on 22.06.2011 by Mrs. Archana Wadhwa and Mr. B.S.V. Murthy, JJ.)</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>