<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 540 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209938</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, pending verification of facts and compliance with procedural requirements by the CIT(A). The Tribunal emphasized procedural fairness for both the assessee and revenue authorities, imposing a cost of Rs. 10,000 on the assessee for each appeal due to their apathy towards lower authorities. The importance of providing adequate hearing opportunities as a fundamental principle of natural justice was underscored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 12:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 540 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209938</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, pending verification of facts and compliance with procedural requirements by the CIT(A). The Tribunal emphasized procedural fairness for both the assessee and revenue authorities, imposing a cost of Rs. 10,000 on the assessee for each appeal due to their apathy towards lower authorities. The importance of providing adequate hearing opportunities as a fundamental principle of natural justice was underscored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>