<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 522 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209919</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal without costs, affirming the deletion of the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Court held that the penalty should not be imposed solely because the Assessing Officer disagreed with the assessee&#039;s claim for royalty income exemption, especially when the assessment was based on the correct return filed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 522 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209919</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal without costs, affirming the deletion of the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Court held that the penalty should not be imposed solely because the Assessing Officer disagreed with the assessee&#039;s claim for royalty income exemption, especially when the assessment was based on the correct return filed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>