<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 519 - Gujarat High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209916</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of interest payment on borrowed capital under Section 14A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961. The Court found that the assessee had surplus funds for investment, no fresh investment was made using borrowed funds, and there was no evidence linking the expenditure to dividend income. The decision was based on presented evidence, and the Court dismissed the Tax Appeal with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 17:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 519 - Gujarat High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209916</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of interest payment on borrowed capital under Section 14A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961. The Court found that the assessee had surplus funds for investment, no fresh investment was made using borrowed funds, and there was no evidence linking the expenditure to dividend income. The decision was based on presented evidence, and the Court dismissed the Tax Appeal with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>