<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 517 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209914</link>
    <description>The High Court Bombay upheld the ITAT decision to delete the penalty under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee, who obtained a loan from close relatives for purchasing a house, successfully argued that it was sourced from agricultural income. Consequently, the penalty was waived, and the appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 17:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 517 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209914</link>
      <description>The High Court Bombay upheld the ITAT decision to delete the penalty under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee, who obtained a loan from close relatives for purchasing a house, successfully argued that it was sourced from agricultural income. Consequently, the penalty was waived, and the appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>