<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 513 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209904</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the eligibility of income from wayside amenities and miscellaneous sources for deduction under section 80-IA, confirming that these income streams do not qualify for the deduction. However, it allowed the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction under section 80-IA for income from the sale of scrap, recognizing it as intimately connected with the business of developing, operating, and maintaining infrastructure facilities. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)&#039;s order allowing depreciation at the rate of 10% on project assets, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal on this issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 513 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209904</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the eligibility of income from wayside amenities and miscellaneous sources for deduction under section 80-IA, confirming that these income streams do not qualify for the deduction. However, it allowed the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction under section 80-IA for income from the sale of scrap, recognizing it as intimately connected with the business of developing, operating, and maintaining infrastructure facilities. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)&#039;s order allowing depreciation at the rate of 10% on project assets, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal on this issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>