<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 329 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209899</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the reassessment proceedings invalid as the Assessing Officer lacked sufficient basis to believe income had escaped assessment, leading to the cancellation of the assessment under section 143(3) read with section 147. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and other grounds challenging the addition on merits were not adjudicated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 12:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 329 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209899</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the reassessment proceedings invalid as the Assessing Officer lacked sufficient basis to believe income had escaped assessment, leading to the cancellation of the assessment under section 143(3) read with section 147. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and other grounds challenging the addition on merits were not adjudicated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>