<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 511 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209897</link>
    <description>The court set aside directions (iv) and (v) issued by the DRP, ruling they exceeded jurisdiction under Section 144C. The writ appeal was allowed, directing the Assessing Officer to follow DRP&#039;s directions excluding (iv) and (v). The court noted the revenue could pursue action under Section 147 if it deemed the Section 10A benefit inapplicable to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 12:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 511 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209897</link>
      <description>The court set aside directions (iv) and (v) issued by the DRP, ruling they exceeded jurisdiction under Section 144C. The writ appeal was allowed, directing the Assessing Officer to follow DRP&#039;s directions excluding (iv) and (v). The court noted the revenue could pursue action under Section 147 if it deemed the Section 10A benefit inapplicable to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>