https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209895 The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Applications (MA 487/2010 and 470/2010) seeking rectification of mistakes in the Larger Bench Order. The interveners' contentions of errors in noting submissions and misapplication of precedents were rejected. The Tribunal clarified the distinction between rectification and review, emphasizing that the applications were disguised review attempts. Upholding principles of judicial discipline, the Tribunal deemed the applications misconceived and lacking merit, underscoring the limited scope of rectification and the need to pursue appellate remedies as provided by law. en-us Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209895 The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Applications (MA 487/2010 and 470/2010) seeking rectification of mistakes in the Larger Bench Order. The interveners' contentions of errors in noting submissions and misapplication of precedents were rejected. The Tribunal clarified the distinction between rectification and review, emphasizing that the applications were disguised review attempts. Upholding principles of judicial discipline, the Tribunal deemed the applications misconceived and lacking merit, underscoring the limited scope of rectification and the need to pursue appellate remedies as provided by law. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209895