<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 522 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209887</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand against M/s. Magarpatta Township Development &amp;amp; Construction Co.Ltd. (MTDCC), ruling that they were not eligible for duty-free capital goods under Notification No. 22/03-CE. The Tribunal found that MTDCC did not meet the required conditions for exemption as they did not own the units utilizing the capital goods. Additionally, the Tribunal held that the extended period for duty demand was validly invoked due to misdeclaration by MTDCC, emphasizing the importance of accurate declarations for availing duty exemptions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 15:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 522 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209887</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand against M/s. Magarpatta Township Development &amp;amp; Construction Co.Ltd. (MTDCC), ruling that they were not eligible for duty-free capital goods under Notification No. 22/03-CE. The Tribunal found that MTDCC did not meet the required conditions for exemption as they did not own the units utilizing the capital goods. Additionally, the Tribunal held that the extended period for duty demand was validly invoked due to misdeclaration by MTDCC, emphasizing the importance of accurate declarations for availing duty exemptions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>