<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 518 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209883</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on imported capital goods need not be reversed when the goods are exported under bond for repairs and later re-imported. The Tribunal applied Rule 6(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 to such export clearances and relied on the Board circular dated 29.08.2000 to hold that sending the goods abroad for repair did not justify reversal of credit. On that basis, the demand, interest and penalty were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 15:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 518 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209883</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on imported capital goods need not be reversed when the goods are exported under bond for repairs and later re-imported. The Tribunal applied Rule 6(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 to such export clearances and relied on the Board circular dated 29.08.2000 to hold that sending the goods abroad for repair did not justify reversal of credit. On that basis, the demand, interest and penalty were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>