<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 518 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209883</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that Cenvat Credit availed on capital goods exported abroad for repair under bond did not require reversal. The Tribunal relied on Rule 6(6) of Cenvat Credit Rules and Board&#039;s Circular, determining that the credit need not be reversed in such cases. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the demand for Cenvat Credit reversal imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 15:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 518 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209883</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that Cenvat Credit availed on capital goods exported abroad for repair under bond did not require reversal. The Tribunal relied on Rule 6(6) of Cenvat Credit Rules and Board&#039;s Circular, determining that the credit need not be reversed in such cases. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the demand for Cenvat Credit reversal imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>