<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 517 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209882</link>
    <description>The court held that the manufacturer was not eligible to avail Cenvat Credit for service tax paid on outward transportation of goods as it did not meet the criteria of an input service under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The judgment emphasized the need for ownership, risk, and integral freight charges to be satisfied for transportation to qualify as an input service. The department&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the original decision disallowing the credit was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 18:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 517 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209882</link>
      <description>The court held that the manufacturer was not eligible to avail Cenvat Credit for service tax paid on outward transportation of goods as it did not meet the criteria of an input service under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The judgment emphasized the need for ownership, risk, and integral freight charges to be satisfied for transportation to qualify as an input service. The department&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the original decision disallowing the credit was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>